Monochromator and spectrograph systems form an image of the entrance slit in the exit plane at the wavelengths present in the light source. There are numerous configurations by which this may be achieved - only the most common are discussed in this document and includes Plane Grating Systems (PGS) and Aberration Corrected Holographic Grating (ACHG) systems.
Definitions
LA - entrance arm length
LB - exit arm length
h - height of entrance slit
h' - height of image of the entrance slit
a - angle of incidence
b - angle of diffraction
w - width of entrance slit
w' - width of entrance slit image
Dg - diameter of a circular grating
Wg - width of a rectangular grating
Hg - height of a rectangular grating
2.2 Fastie-Ebert Configuration
A Fastie-Ebert instrument consists of one large spherical mirror and one plane diffraction grating (see Figure 6).
A portion of the mirror first collimates the light which will fall upon the plane grating. A separate portion of the mirror then focuses the dispersed light from the grating into images of the entrance slit in the exit plane.
It is an inexpensive and commonly used design, but exhibits limited ability to maintain image quality offaxis due to system aberrations such as spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, and a curved focal field.
Figure 6. Plane Grating Configuration
2.3 Czerny-Turner
Configuration
The Czerny-Turner (CZ) monochromator consists of two concave
mirrors and one plano diffraction grating (see Figure
7).
Although the two mirrors function in the same separate
capacities as the single spherical mirror of the Fastie-Ebert
configuration,
i.e., first collimating the light source (mirror 1), and
second, focusing the dispersed light from the grating
(mirror
2), the geometry of the mirrors in the Czerny-Turner configuration
is flexible.
By using an asymmetrical geometry, a Czerny-Turner configuration
may be designed to produce a flattened spectral field and
good coma correction at one wavelength. Spherical aberration
and astigmatism will remain at all wavelengths.
It is also possible to design a system that may accommodate
very large optics.
Figure 7. Czerny-Turner Configuration
2.4 Czerny-Turner/Fastie-Ebert
PGS Aberrations
PGS spectrometers exhibit certain aberrations that degrade
spectral resolution, spatial resolution, or signaltonoise
ratio. The most significant are astigmatism, coma, spherical
aberration and defocusing. PGS systems are used offaxis,
so the aberrations will be different in each plane. It is
not within the scope of this document to review the concepts
and details of these aberrations, (reference 4) however,
it is useful to understand the concept of Optical Path Difference
(OPD) when considering the effects of aberrations.
Basically, an OPD is the difference between an actual wavefront
produced and a "reference
wavefront" that would be obtained if there were no aberrations.
This reference
wavefront is
a sphere centered at the image or a plane if the image
is at infinity. For example:
Defocusing results in rays finding a focus outside the
detector surface producing a blurred image that will degrade
bandpass, spatial resolution, and optical signal-to-noise
ratio. A good example could be the spherical wavefront
illuminating
mirror M1 in Figure 7. Defocusing should not be a problem
in a PGS monochromator used with a single exit slit and
a PMT detector. However, in an uncorrected PGS there is
field curvature that would display defocusing towards the
ends of a planar linear diode array. Geometrically corrected
CZ configurations such as that shown in Figure 7 nearly
eliminate the problem. The OPD due to defocusing varies
as the square
of the numerical aperture.
Coma is the result of the off-axis geometry of a PGS
and is seen as a skewing of rays in the dispersion plane
enlarging the base on one side of a spectral line as shown
in Figure 8. Coma may be responsible for both degraded
bandpass and optical signal-to-noise ratio. The OPD due
to coma
varies
as the cube of the numerical aperture. Coma may be corrected
at one wavelength in a CZ by calculating an appropriate
operating geometry as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 8. The Effect of Coma
Spherical aberration is the result of rays emanating
away from the centre of an optical surface failing to find
the same focal point as those from the centre (See Figure
9). The OPD due to spherical aberration varies with the
fourth power of the numerical aperture and cannot be corrected
without the use of aspheric optics.

Figure 9. The Effect of Spherical Aberration
Astigmatism is characteristic of an off-axis geometry. In this case a spherical mirror illuminated by a plane wave incident at an angle to the normal (such as mirror M2 in Figure 7) will present two foci: the tangential focus, Ft, and the sagittal focus, FS. Astigmatism has the effect of taking a point at the entrance slit and imaging it as a line perpendicular to the dispersion plane at the exit (see Figure 10), thereby preventing spatial resolution and increasing slit height with subsequent degradation of optical signaltonoise ratio. The OPD due to astigmatism varies with the square of numerical aperture and the square of the offaxis angle and cannot be corrected without employing aspheric optics.

Figure 10. Effects of Astigmatism in a Concave Mirror used "Off-Axis"
2.4.1 Aberration
Correcting Plane Gratings
Recent advances in holographic grating technology now permits
complete correction of ALL aberrations present in a spherical
mirror based CZ spectrometer at one wavelength, with excellent
mitigation over a wide wavelength range (Reference 12).
2.5
Concave Aberration Corrected Holographic Gratings
Both the monochromators and spectrographs of this type use
a single holographic grating with no ancillary optics.
In these systems, the grating both focuses and diffracts
the incident light.
With only one optic in their design, these devices are inexpensive
and compact. Figure 11a illustrates an ACHG monochromator.
Figure 11b illustrates an ACHG spectrograph in which the
location of the focal plane is established by:
bH - Angle between perpendicular
to spectral plane and grating normal.
LH - Perpendicular distance from
spectral plane to grating.

Figure 11a. An ACHG Monochromator

Figure 11b. An ACHG Spectrograph
2.6 Calculating
alpha and beta in a Monochromator Configuration
From Equation (1-2),
(remains
constant)
Taking this equation and Equation (1-3),
(2-1)
Use Equations (2-1) and (1-2) to determine a and b,
respectively. See Table 3 for worked examples.
Note: In
practice the highest wavelength attainable is limited
by the mechanical rotation of the grating. This means that
doubling the groove density of the grating will halve the
spectral range (see Section 2.14).
2.7 Monochromator System Optics
To understand how a complete monochromator system is characterized,
it is necessary to start at the transfer optics that brings
light from the source to illuminate the entrance slit
(see Figure 12). Here
we have "unrolled" the system
and drawn it in a linear fashion.

AS - aperture stop
L1 - lens 1
M1 - mirror 1
M2 - mirror 2
G1 - grating
p - object distance to lens L1
q - image distance from lens L1
F - focal length of lens L1 (focus of an object at infinity)
d - the clear aperture of the lens (L1 in diagram)
W - half-angle
s - area of the source
s' - area of the image of the source
2.8 Aperture
Stops and Entrance and Exit Pupils
An aperture stop (AS) limits the opening through which a
cone of light may pass and is usually located adjacent to
an active optic.
A pupil is either an aperture stop or the image of an aperture
stop.
The entrance pupil of the entrance (transfer) optics in
Figure 12 is the virtual image of AS as seen axially through
lens L1 from the source.
The entrance pupil of the spectrometer is the image of the
grating (G1) seen axially through mirror M1 from the entrance
slit.
The exit pupil of the entrance optics is
AS itself seen axially from the entrance slit of the spectrometer.
The exit pupil of the spectrometer is the
image of the grating seen axially through M2 from the exit
slit.
2.9
Aperture Ratio (f/value, f/Number), and Numerical Aperture
(NA)
The light gathering power of an optic is rigorously characterized
by Numerical Aperture (NA).
Numerical Aperture is expressed by:
where μ is the refractive index (μ = 1 in air) (2-2)
and
f/value by:
(2-3)
Table 2: Relationship between f/value, half-angle, and numerical aperture
| f/value | f/2 |
f/3 |
f/5 |
f/7 |
f/10 |
f/15 |
| n (degrees) | 14.48 |
9.6 |
5.7 |
4.0 |
2.9 |
1.9 |
| NA | 0.25 |
0.16 |
0.10 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
2.9.1 f/value
of a Lens System
f/value is also given by the ratio of either the image or
object distance to the diameter of the pupil. When, for
example, a lens is working with finite conjugates such as
in Fig. 12, there is an effective f/value from the source
to L1 (with diameter AS) given by:
(2-4)
and from L1 to the entrance slit by:
(2-5)
In the sections that follow f/value will always be calculated
assuming that the entrance or exit pupils are equivalent
to the aperture stop for the lens or grating and the distances
are measured to the center of the lens or grating.
When the f/value is calculated in this way for f/2 or greater
(e.g. f/3, f/4, etc.), then sin w is
~ tan w and the approximation is good. However, if an
active optic
is to function at an f/value significantly less than f/2,
then
the f/value should be determined by first calculating Numerical
Aperture from the half-angle.
2.9.2 f/value
of a Spectrometer
Because the angle of incidence alpha is always different
in either sign or value from the angle of diffraction beta
(except in Littrow), the projected size of the grating varies
with the wavelength and is different depending on whether
it is viewed from the entrance or exit slits. In Figures
13a and 13b, the widths W' and W'' are the projections of
the grating width as perceived at the entrance and exit
slits, respectively.

Figure 13. Projection of the grating width on (a) the Entrance
and (b) the Exit.
To determine the f/value of a spectrometer with a rectangular
grating, it is first necessary to calculate the "equivalent
diameter", D', as seen from the entrance slit and D"
as seen from the exit slit. This is achieved by equating
the projected area of the grating to that of a circular
disc and then calculating the diameter D' or D".
(2-6)
(2-7)
In a spectrometer, therefore, the f/valuein
will not equal the f/valueout.
(2-8)
(2-9)
where, for a rectangular grating, D' and D" are
given by:
(2-10)
(2-11)
where, for a circular grating, D' and D" are
given by:
(2-12)
(2-13)
Table 3 shows how the f/value changes with wavelength.
Table 3 Calculated values for f/valuein
and f/valueout for a Czerny-Turner
configuration with 68 x 68 mm, 1800 g/mm grating and LA
= LB = F = 320 nm. Dv = 24°.
| l(nm) |
a |
b |
f/valuein |
f/valueout |
200 |
1.40 |
22.60 |
4.17 |
4.34 |
320 |
5.12 |
29.12 |
4.18 |
4.46 |
500 |
15.39 |
39.39 |
4.25 |
4.74 |
680 |
26.73 |
50.73 |
4.41 |
5.24 |
800 |
35.40 |
59.40 |
4.62 |
5.84 |
2.9.3 Magnification
and Flux Density
In any spectrometer system a light source should be imaged
onto an entrance slit (aperture) which is then imaged
onto
the exit slit and so on to the detector, sample, etc. This
process inevitably results in the magnification or demagnification
of one or more of the images of the light source. Magnification
may be determined by the following expansions, taking
as
an example the source imaged by lens L1 in Figure 12 onto
the entrance slit:
(2-14)
Similarly, flux density is determined by the area that the
photons in an image occupy, so changes in magnification
are important if a flux density sensitive detector or sample
are present. Changes in the flux density in an image may
be characterized by the ratio of the area of the object,
S, to the area of the image, S', from which the following
expressions may be derived:
(2-15)
These relationships show that the area occupied by an image
is determined by the ratio of the square of the f/values.
Consequently, it is the EXIT f/value that determines the
flux density in the image of an object. Those using photographic
film as a detector will recognize these relationships in
determining the exposure time necessary to obtain a certain
signal-to-noise ratio.
2.10 Exit
Slit Width and Anamorphism
Anamorphic optics are those optics that magnify (or demagnify)
a source by different factors in the vertical and horizontal
planes (see Figure 14).

Figure 14. (a) Vertical and (b) Horizontal Magnification
In the case of a diffraction grating-based instrument, the
image of the entrance slit is NOT imaged 1:1 in the exit
plane (except in Littrow and perpendicular to the dispersion
plane assuming LA = LB).
This means that in virtually all commercial instruments
the tradition of maintaining equal entrance and exit slit
widths may not always be appropriate.
Geometric horizontal magnification depends on the ratio
of the cosines of the angle of incidence, alpha, and the
angle of diffraction, beta, and the LB/LA
ratio (Equation 216). Magnification may change substantially
with wavelength (see Table 4).
(2-16)
Table 4 illustrates the relationship between alpha, beta,
dispersion, horizontal magnification of entrance slit
image,
and bandpass.
Table 4 Relationship Between Dispersion, Horizontal
Magnification, and Bandpass in a CzernyTurner Monochromator.
LA = 320 mm, LB
= 320 mm, Dv = 24°, n = 1800 g/mm Entrance slit
width = 1 mm
|
Wavelength |
a
|
b (degrees) |
dispersion
|
horizontal magnification |
bandpass*
|
200 |
-1.4 |
22.60 |
1.60 |
1.08 |
1.74 |
260 |
1.84 |
25.84 |
1.56 |
1.11 |
1.74 |
320 |
5.12 |
29.12 |
1.46 |
1.14 |
1.73 |
380 |
8.47 |
32.47 |
1.41 |
1.17 |
1.72 |
440 |
11.88 |
35.88 |
1.34 |
1.21 |
1.70 |
500 |
15.39 |
39.39 |
1.27 |
1.25 |
1.67 |
560 |
19.01 |
43.01 |
1.19 |
1.29 |
1.64 |
620 |
22.78 |
46.78 |
1.10 |
1.35 |
1.60 |
680 |
26.73 |
50.73 |
1.00 |
1.41 |
1.55 |
740 |
30.91 |
54.91 |
0.88 |
1.49 |
1.49 |
800 |
35.40 |
59.40 |
1.60 |
1.60 |
1.42 |
Exit slit width matched to image of entrance slit.
*As the inclination of the grating becomes increasingly
large, coma in the system will increase. Consequently, in
spite of the fact that the bandpass at 800 nm is superior
to that at 200 nm, it is unlikely that the full improvement
will be seen by the user in systems of less than f/8.
2.11 Slit
Height Magnification
Slit height magnification is directly proportional to the
ratio of the entrance and exit arm lengths and remains constant
with wavelength (exclusive of the effects of aberrations
that may be present).
(2-17)
Note: Geometric magnification is not an aberration!
2.12 Bandpass
and Resolution
In the most fundamental sense both bandpass and resolution
are used as measure of an instrument's ability to separate
adjacent spectral lines.
Assuming a continuum light source, the bandpass (BP) of
an instrument is the spectral interval that may be isolated.
This depends on many factors including the width of the
grating, system aberrations, spatial resolution of the detector,
and entrance and exit slit widths.
If a light source emits a spectrum which consists of a
single monochromatic wavelength lo
(Figure 15) and is analyzed by a perfect spectrometer,
the output should be identical to the spectrum of the emission
(Fig. 16) which is a perfect line at precisely lo.

In reality, spectrometers are not perfect and produce an
apparent spectral broadening of the purely monochromatic
wavelength. The line profile now has finite width and is
known as the "instrumental line profile" (instrumental
bandpass) (see Figure 17).
The instrumental profile may be determined in a fixed grating
spectrograph configuration with the use of a reasonably
monochromatic light source such as a single mode dye laser.
For a given set of entrance and exit slit parameters, the
grating is fixed at the proper orientation for the central
wavelength of interest and the laser light source is scanned
in wavelength. The output of the detector is recorded and
displayed. The resultant trace will show intensity versus
wavelength distribution.
For a monochromator the same result would be achieved if
a monochromatic light source is introduced into the system
and the grating rotated.
The bandpass is then defined as the Full Width at Half Maximum
(FWHM) of the trace assuming monochromatic light.
Any spectral structure may be considered to be the sum of
an infinity of single monochromatic lines at different wavelengths.
Thus, there is a relationship between the instrumental line
profile, the real spectrum and the recorded spectrum.
Let B(l) be the real spectrum of the source to be analysed.
Let F(l) be the recorded spectrum through the spectrometer.
Let P(l) be the instrumental line profile.
(2-18)
The recorded function F(l) is the convolution of the
real spectrum and the instrumental line profile.
The shape of the instrumental line profile is a function
of various parameters:
- the width of the entrance slit
- the width of the exit slit or of one pixel in the case of a multichannel detector
- diffraction phenomena
- aberrations
-
quality of the system's components and alignment
Each of these factors may be characterized by a special
function Pi(l), each obtained by neglecting the other
parameters. The overall instrumental line profile P(l)
is related to the convolution of the individual terms:
(2-19)
2.12.1
Influence of the Slits (P1(l))
If the slits are
of finite width and there are no other contributing effects
to broaden the line, and if:
Went = width of the image of the
entrance slit
Wex = width of the exit slit or
of one pixel in the case of a multichannel detector
Dl1 = linear dispersion
x Went
Dl2 = linear dispersion
x Wex
then the slit's contribution to the instrumental line profile
is the convolution of the two slit functions (see Figure
18).

Figure 18. Convolution of Entrance with Exit Slits
2.12.2
Influence of Diffraction (P2(l))
If the two slits are infinitely narrow and aberrations
negligible, then the instrumental line profile is that
of a classic
diffraction pattern. In this case, the resolution of the
system is the wavelength, l, divided by the theoretical
resolving power of the grating, R (Equation 1-11).
2.12.3
Influence of Aberrations (P3(l))
If the two slits are infinitely narrow and broadening of the line due to aberrations is large compared to the size due to diffraction, then the instrumental line profile due to diffraction is enlarged.
2.12.4
Determination of the FWHM of the Instrumental Profile
In practice the FWHM of F(l)
is determined by the convolution of the various causes
of line broadening including:
dl (resolution): the limiting resolution of the spectrometer
is governed by the limiting instrumental line profile and
includes system aberrations and diffraction effects.
dl (slits): bandpass determined by finite spectrometer
slit widths.
dl (line): natural line width of the spectral line
used to measure the FWHM.
Assuming a gaussian line profile (which is not the case),
a reasonable approximation of the FWHM is provided by the
relationship:
(2-20)
In general, most spectrometers are not routinely used at
the limit of their resolution so the influence of the
slits
may dominate the line profile. From Figure 18 the FWHM,
due to the slits, is determined by either the image of
the
entrance
slit or the exit slit, whichever is greater. If the two
slits are perfectly matched and aberrations minimal compared
to the effect of the slits, then the FWHM will be half
the width at the base of the peak. (Aberrations may, however,
still produce broadening of the base). Bandpass (BP) is
then given by:
BP = FWHM ~ linear dispersion x (exit slit width or the
image of the entrance slit, whichever is greater).
In Section 2-10 image enlargement through the spectrometer
was reviewed. The impact on the determination of the system
bandpass may be determined by taking Equation 2-16 to
calculate the width of the image of the entrance slit
and
multiplying it by the dispersion (Equation 1-5).
Bandpass is then given by:
(2-21)
The major benefit of optimising the exit slit width is to
obtain maximum THROUGHPUT without loss of bandpass.
It is interesting to note from Equations (2-21) and (1-5)
that:
- Bandpass varies as cos a
- Dispersion varies as cos b
2.12.5 Image Width
and Array Detectors
Because the image in the exit plane changes in width as
a function of wavelength, the user of an array type detector
must be aware of the number of pixels per bandpass that
are illuminated. It is normal to allocate 3-6 pixels to
determine one bandpass. If the image increases in size by
a factor of 1.5, then clearly photons contained within that
bandpass would have to be collected over 4-9 pixels. For
a discussion of the relation between wavelength and pixel
position see Section 5. The FWHM that determines bandpass
is equivalent to the width of the image of the entrance
slit containing a typical maximum of 80% of available photons
at the wavelength of interest; the remainder is spread out
in the base of the peak. Any image magnification, therefore,
equally enlarges the base spreading the entire peak over
additional pixels.
2.12.6
Discussion
a) Bandpass with Monochromatic Light
The infinitely narrow natural spectral band width of monochromatic
light is, by definition, less than that of the instrumental
bandpass determined by Equation 2-20. (A very narrow band
width is typically referred to as a "line" because
of its appearance in a spectrum).
In this case all the photons present will be at exactly
the same wavelength irrespective of how they are spread
out in the exit plane. The image of the entrance slit, therefore,
will consist exclusively of photons at the same wavelength
even though there is a finite FWHM. Consequently, bandpass
in this instance cannot be considered as a wavelength spread
around the center wavelength. If, for example, monochromatic
light at 250 nm is present and the instrumental bandpass
is set to produce a FWHM of 5 nm, this does NOT mean 250
nm ± 2.5 nm because no wavelength other than 250 nm is
present. It does mean, however, that a spectrum traced out
(wavelength vs. intensity) will produce a "peak"
with an apparent FWHM of "5 nm" due to instrumental
and NOT spectral line broadening.
b) Bandpass with "Line" Sources of Finite
Spectral Width
Emission lines with finite natural spectral bandwidths are
routinely found in almost all forms of spectroscopy including
emission, Raman, fluorescence, and absorption.
In these cases spectra may be obtained that seem to consist
of line emission (or absorption) bands. If, however, one
of these "lines" is analysed with a very high
resolution spectrometer, it would be determined that beyond
a certain bandpass no further line narrowing would take
place indicating that the natural bandwidth had been reached.
Depending on the instrument system the natural bandwidth
may or may not be greater than the bandpass determined
by
Equation 2-20.
If the natural bandwidth is greater than the instrumental
bandpass, then the instrument will perform as if the emission
"line" is a portion of a continuum. In this case
the bandpass may indeed be viewed as a spectral spread of
± 0.5 BP around a center wavelength at FWHM.
Example 1:
Figure 19 shows a somewhat contrived spectrum where the
first two peaks are separated on the recording by 32 mm.
The FWHM of the first peak is the same as the second but
is less than the third. This implies that the natural
bandwidth
of the third peak is greater than the bandpass of the spectrometer
and would not demonstrate spectral narrowing of its bandwidth
even if evaluated with a very high resolution spectrometer.
The first and second peaks, however, may well possess natural
bandwidths less than that shown by the spectrometer. In
these two cases, the same instrument operating under higher
bandpass conditions (narrower slits) may well reveal either
additional "lines" that had previously been incorporated
into just one band, or a simple narrowing of the bandwidth
until either the limit of the spectrometer or the limiting
natural bandpass have been reached.

Figure 19. Strip Chart Recording Plotting Wavelength vs. Intensity where *BP = FWHM (in mm) x Dispersion
Example 2:
A researcher finds a spectrum in a journal that would
be appropriate to reproduce on an inhouse spectrometer.
The first task is to determine the bandpass displayed
by
the spectrum. If this information is not given, then it
is necessary to study the spectrum itself. Assuming that
the wavelengths of the two peaks are known, then the distance
between them must be measured with a ruler as accurately
as possible. If the wavelength difference is found to be
1.25 nm and this increment is spread over 32 mm (see Figure
19), the recorded dispersion of the spectrum = 1.25/32
= 0.04 nm/mm. It is now possible to determine the bandpass
by measuring the distance in mm at the Full Width at Half
Maximum height (FWHM). Let us say that this is 4 mm; the
bandpass of the instrument is then 4 mm x 0.04 nm/mm =
0.16 nm.
Also assuming that the spectrometer described in Table
4 is to be used, then from Equation 2-21 and the list
of
maximum wavelengths described in Table 6, the following
options are available to produce a bandpass of 0.16 nm:
Table 5: Variation of Dispersion and Slit Width
to Produce 0.16 nm Bandpass in a 320 mm Focal Length Czerny-Turner
| Groove
Density |
Dispersion
|
Entrance Slit Width (microns) |
300 |
9.2 |
17 |
600 |
4.6 |
35 |
1200 |
2.3 |
70 |
1800 |
1.5 |
107 |
2400 |
1.15 |
139 |
3600 |
0.77 |
208 |
The best choice
would be the 3600 g/mm option to provide the largest slit
width possible to permit the greatest amount of light to
enter the system.
2.13 Order
and Resolution
If a given wavelength is used in higher orders, for example,
from first to second order, it is considered that because
the dispersion is doubled, so also is the limiting resolution.
In a monochromator in which there are ancillary optics such
as plane or concave mirrors, lenses, etc., a linear increase
in the limiting resolution may not occur. The reasons for
this include:
- Changes in system aberrations as the grating is rotated (e.g., coma)
- Changes in the diffracted wavefront of the grating in higher orders (most serious with classically ruled gratings)
- Residual system aberrations such as spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, and field curvature swamping grating capabilities (particularly low f/value, e.g., f/3, f/4 systems)
Even if the full width at half maximum is maintained, a
degradation in line shape will often occur - the base
of
the peak usually broadens with consequent degradation of
the percentage of available photons in the FWHM.
2.14 Dispersion
and Maximum Wavelength
The longest possible wavelength (lmax1)
an instrument will reach mechanically with a grating of
a given groove
density is determined by the limit of mechanical rotation
of that grating. Consequently, in changing from an original
groove density, n1, to a new groove density, n2,
the new highest wavelength (lmax2)
will be:
(2-22)
Table 6: Variation in Maximum Wavelength with Groove
Denisty in a Typical Monochromator
LA = LB
= F = 320 mm, DV = 24°. In this example maximum
wavelength at maximum possible mechanical rotation of a
1200 g/mm
grating
= 1300 nm
| Groove
Density |
Dispersion (nm/mm) |
Max
Wavelength |
150 |
18.4 |
10400 |
300 |
9.2 |
5200 |
600 |
4.6 |
2600 |
1200 |
2.3 |
1300 |
1800 |
1.5 |
867 |
2400 |
1.15 |
650 |
3600 |
0.77 |
433 |
From Table 6
it is clear that if a 3600 g/mm grating is required to diffract
light above 433 nm, the system will not permit it. If, however,
a dispersion of 0.77 nm/mm is required to produce appropriate
resolution at, say, 600 nm, a system should be acquired
with 640 mm focal length (Equation (1-5)). This would produce
a dispersion of 0.77 nm/mm with a 2400 g/mm grating and
also permit mechanical rotation up to 650 nm.
2.15
Order and Dispersion
In Example 2, Section 2.12.6, the solution to the dispersion
problem could be solved by using a 2400 g/mm grating in
a 640 mm focal length system. As dispersion varies with
focal length (LB), groove density
(n), and order (k); for a fixed LB
at a given wavelength, the dispersion equation (Equation
1-5) simplifies to:
kn = constant
Therefore, if first order dispersion = 1.15 nm/mm with
a 2400 g/mm grating the same dispersion would be obtained
with a 1200 g/mm grating in second order. Keeping in mind
that kl = constant for a given groove density, n,
(Equation 1-9), using second order with an 1800 g/mm grating
to solve the last problem would not work because to find
600 nm in second order, it would be necessary to operate
at 1200 nm in first order, when it may be seen in Table
6 that the maximum attainable first order wavelength is
867 nm.
However, if a dispersion of 0.77 nm/mm is necessary in the
W at 250 nm, this wavelength could be monitored at 500 nm
in first order with the 1800 g/mm grating and obtain a second
order dispersion of 0.75 nm/mm. In this case any first order
light at 500 nm would be superimposed on top of the 250
nm light (and vice-versa). Wavelength selective filters
may then be used to eliminate the unwanted radiation.
The main disadvantages of this approach are that the grating
efficiency would not be as great as an optimized first
order
grating and order-sorting filters are typically inefficient.
If a classically ruled grating is employed, ghosts and
stray
light will increase as the square of the order.
2.16 Choosing a
Monochromator/Spectrograph
Select an instrument based on:
- A system that will allow the largest entrance slit width for the bandpass required.
- The highest dispersion.
- The largest optics affordable.
- Longest focal length affordable.
- Highest groove density that will accommodate the spectral range.
- Optics and coatings appropriate for specific spectral range.
- Entrance optics which will optimize etendue.
- If the instrument is to be used at a single wavelength in a non-scanning mode, then it must be possible to adjust the exit slit to match the size of the entrance slit image.
Remember: f/value is not always the controlling factor of
throughput. For example, light may be collected from a source
at f/1 and projected onto the entrance slit of an f/6 monochromator
so that the entire image is contained within the slit. Then
the system will operate on the basis of the photon collection
in the f/l cone and not the f/6 cone of the monochromator.
See Section 3.
